MA: State’s Highest Court Orders Release Of Sex Offender Held Since 1970s

Massachusetts’ highest court ruled Thursday that a 71-year-old convicted sex offender held for more than 40 years as a sexually dangerous person can be released, after two mental health professionals ruled that he was no longer a risk.

The court essentially upheld an earlier decision from 2009 in ruling that ___ ___ can’t continue to be held at the Massachusetts Treatment Center. Full Article

Related

Calling for change before offender ____ is free

Tough on sex offender legislation not refiled

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“In fact, the Department of Correction reported that of 49 people released from civil commitment from 2015 to 2017, only one went to prison — and not for a sexual offense.”

Hmmm…by my calculations, this is a ZERO PERCENT sexual recidivism rate. But, hey, I suck at math. I’m sure the politicians are much better at math than I am. [sarcasm]

Imagine the public protest that is forthcoming should he actually gain release. You can bank on that.

I’m really glad this guy’s been released. But being the pessimist that I am, I can’t help but think they’re gonna use this guy to keep up this civil commitment scheme should it ever go to the supreme court. They’re basically going to say, “It’s not really indefinite. We released a couple. Sure it was only 2 out of a million, but it proves our point.” These people are animals.

This is an outrageous claim,
“Nothing much is likely to change immediately for Chapman. He’s facing new criminal charges, after he allegedly exposed himself and masturbated in front of prison staff and nurses in June 2018. He pleaded not guilty.”
So the guy has been locked up for decades and all of a sudden he gets this charge when he is finally granted relief and release? If this is the case the only possible explanation, besides the Goons wanting to keep him locked up with bogus charges, would be that he does not want to be released after so long of incarceration. That is plausible but doubtful really. But, then again he may be very scared and intimidated by being up for release into a world where everyone is going to try everything they can to hurt him or ridicule and shame him forever. Frigging 71 might as well just call it done deal and stay in any way possible really. Nothing really to gain by being released now. Be harassed and threatened or even physically attacked by the witch hunters or just stay where you are at and be fed, clothed, warm bed, and have everyone basically wait on you till you are dead. I know not ideal for a younger man, but hell this guy is ready for a old folks home that do not take half as good as care of you as the state in these places. Just facts…